Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 12:50:24 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Robert Millan <rmh@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: headers that use "struct bintime" Message-ID: <C876701D-6E4A-403F-A07D-52B45DD4E96C@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <15087.1337452249@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <15087.1337452249@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 19, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20120520004236.D1313@besplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: >> On Sat, 19 May 2012, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>>>> Or maybe "struct bintime" be defined unconditionally? >>> >>> I think this is the best/right way to go. >> >> Not permitted. > >> sys/time.h is still massively polluted in other ways: >> [...] >> Not permitted in POSIX.1, [...] > > I think at this time, we can either religiously stick to POSIX > and become irellevant with it, or we can develop our APIs to > become useful and desirable, and have a chance to survive. Doesn't __BSD_VISIBLE do just that? Warner > Strictly 1980-compatible APIs will not gain FreeBSD 10+ any > new users. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C876701D-6E4A-403F-A07D-52B45DD4E96C>