Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 20:17:24 -0400 From: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_X vs. WITHOUT_X11 vs. NO_X Message-ID: <20010601201724.B90897@databits.net> In-Reply-To: <3B17F09C.2EFB0B48@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:44:28PM %2B0300 References: <15127.61125.223478.210748@guru.mired.org> <3B17F09C.2EFB0B48@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
++ 01/06/01 22:44 +0300 - Maxim Sobolev: | I'm voting for WITHOUT_X11 - it is unlikely that we will see X12 in a foreseable | future, so why to bother? | | -Maxim [ 10 years ago ] "Why add support for 4-digit years? I doubt people will still be using this old version of software in 10 years!" :) I agree that the variable should be WITHOUT_X, too. It's a good counterpart to NO_X in /usr/src land. -pete -- Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> Databits Network Services, Inc. <http://databits.net>; finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010601201724.B90897>