Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:02:41 +0300 (MSK) From: "."@babolo.ru To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: High ping latency using two ethernet under FreeBSD 4.11 ... Message-ID: <1110967361.940194.2803.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050315135749.A92893@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 .@babolo.ru wrote: > > >> but didn't think this was doable ... > > Why not: > > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.2/24 > > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.2/24 alias > > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.10/32 alias > > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.5/32 alias > > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.254/32 alias > > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.251/32 alias > > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.244/32 alias > > so on > > ? > > With the only fxp0 interface > Great ... I have a new server going down next week that I'll try out the > ng_fec stuff with, and the above, then ... thanks ... If addresses and not bandwidth is reason, no need for ng_fec. > > You can freely add or delete all /32 addresses > > while not 200.46.204.2 and 200.46.208.2 > That's cool, since those IPs are just for the base server itself, and > never get removed ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1110967361.940194.2803.nullmailer>