Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:34:54 +0000 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interactive ports - the plague Message-ID: <20080303213454.53f29198@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <47CC49B8.6080501@bsdforen.de> References: <47CBC3C5.9050007@bsdforen.de> <20080303155354.2043d131@gumby.homeunix.com.> <47CC49B8.6080501@bsdforen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:55:52 +0100 Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100 > > Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> wrote: > > > >> I cannot find any policy on interactive ports in the Porters' > >> Handbook. Maybe there aught to be one. > > > > Setting BATCH is supposed to prevent genuinely interactive ports > > from building (that's actually the original purpose of BATCH). > > But this will also keep the config screens away from me, which can be > handled before all builds quite comfortably. Not if you do the config screens before setting BATCH.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080303213454.53f29198>