Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 08 Jan 2000 11:43:25 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it>
Cc:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, Patrick Bihan-Faou <patrick@mindstep.com>, Harold Gutch <logix@foobar.franken.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Subject:   Re: ipfw optimizations 
Message-ID:  <13449.947328205@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 08 Jan 2000 10:29:25 %2B0100." <200001080929.KAA09763@info.iet.unipi.it> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200001080929.KAA09763@info.iet.unipi.it>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
>> I think the general syntax would be if you could say "for one of my
>> own IP#"  that would be very powerful:
>> 
>> 	add allow tcp from any to me 22
>> 	add deny tcp from any to not me 22
>
>the 'me' thing is relatively simple to implement, it suffices to scan
>the list of IP associated with all interfaces. Can be time-consuming.

But less so that having one ipfw rule for each interface :-)


--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13449.947328205>