Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:30:04 -0700 (PDT) From: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp (Nakata Maho) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/41652: port update science/chemtool Message-ID: <200208160130.g7G1U4Fi061853@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/41652; it has been noted by GNATS. From: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp (Nakata Maho) To: naddy@mips.inka.de Cc: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/41652: port update science/chemtool Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:25:35 +0900 (JST) Hello, Mr. Christian Weisgerber, thank you very much for your comment. > > PORTNAME= chemtool > > -PORTVERSION= 1.3.1 > > +PORTVERSION= 1.6 > > No... > > > CATEGORIES= science > > -MASTER_SITES= http://www.uni-ulm.de/~s_tvolk/chemtool/src/ > > +MASTER_SITES= http://ruby.chemie.uni-freiburg.de/~martin/chemtool/ > > +DISTNAME= ct16a6 > > This is not version 1.6, this is some alpha version. > Either fix PORTVERSION, or better yet wait for the next release. Next release may be later, but many useful features are available in these development series. Many templates, useful import mode from BABEL, MDL molfile... everything is good for chemist. I'm currently using this one but I don't have serious problems. If it is possible, what PORTVERSION should be set? 16a6? 1.6.0.6? > > +do-build: > > + @(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${GMAKE}) > > Why introduce a do-build target here? CFLAGS are ignored, so that I set ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV}. > General note: Each command line in a Makefile is executed in a > separate shell invocation. Adding an extra subshell (...) is usless. Thank you very much for your advice. Sincerely yours, Nakata Maho To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208160130.g7G1U4Fi061853>