Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:40:22 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> Cc: Alex Huppenthal <alex@aspenworks.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BGP package recommendation? Message-ID: <20010427174022.G83671@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104271159500.57404-100000@cody.jharris.com>; from nick@rogness.net on Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:01:42PM -0500 References: <008901c0cf2c$ee6bd990$1700a8c0@d7k> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104271159500.57404-100000@cody.jharris.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MrRUTeZlqqNo1jQ9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:01:42PM -0500, Nick Rogness wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Alex Huppenthal wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > Now that ATM is working, we're pressing on with BGP for the backbone. > > Any recommendation for a BGP package on FreeBSD 4.3 ? >=20 > `gated' or `zebra'. Both are in the ports (ports/net). I have > used gated but I heard zebra was easier to manage. My experience is that zebra is easier to manage, but has had reliability problems in the past due to the fact that it's still being actively developed. Your milage may vary, but it's worth trying. Joe --MrRUTeZlqqNo1jQ9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjrpoPYACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbLHQCfQ9O42GewPEVHme7BRx+SxgvC aegAoKIsQKhBSiHEwoZB0yH/5FeCZsNk =RUxD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MrRUTeZlqqNo1jQ9-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010427174022.G83671>