Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:18:54 +0200
From:      Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>
Cc:        emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop chapter.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu chapter.sgml
Message-ID:  <4EE3CCBE.80204@otenet.gr>
In-Reply-To: <20111210221313.000064ae@unknown>
References:  <201112072132.pB7LW6Aa042461@repoman.freebsd.org>	<20111210214025.0000445d@unknown> <20111210221313.000064ae@unknown>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/12/2011 11:13 μμ, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:40:25 +0100 Alexander Leidinger
> <Alexander@Leidinger.net>  wrote:
>
> Restricting the audience a little bit...
>
>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Manolis Kiagias
>> <manolis@FreeBSD.org>  wrote:
>>>    Log:
>>>    Use /compat/linux/proc instead of /usr/compat/linux/proc as the
>>> mount point of linproc in the examples, since:
>>>
>>>    - linux_base always installs to /compat and creates it as a
>>> directory if it does not exist as a symlink
>>>    - Custom installations (not done by sysinstall(8)) may not
>>> have /compat at all
>> I try to get some time to have a look at fixing the linux_base ports,
>> but anyone is free to have a look too, as I'm not sure if I get enough
>> time to fix them before the release.
> Untested patch attached. I got the time to check the f10 port and come
> up with something, but I don't have the time to test. It would be great
> if someone could test it (as a port and as a package, don't forget to
> (re)move /compat away).
>

Got a clean VirtualBox install available, will give it a try and report 
back.

Cheers,
manolis@



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EE3CCBE.80204>