Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 10:19:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom? Message-ID: <20030726101853.O2874@catalyst.chemikals.org> In-Reply-To: <20030726002537.B19390@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20030724231947.I30706@topperwein.pennasoft.com> <20030725.063655.88948403.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030726002537.B19390@carver.gumbysoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > : Can they now take "they took relevant steps" as a defence in a law court? > > > > That's a very interesting question. > > Which might get answered since some industrious folks aligned with a > certain other open source operating system are in the process of reverse > engineering said devices. Would not said software be illegal to distribute in the US?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030726101853.O2874>