Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:35:53 +0400 From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> To: "William LeFebvre" <bill@lefebvre.org>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage, now threads Message-ID: <03f601c80f51$da2032d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> References: <008801c80e66$7be49490$0c00a8c0@Artem> <471367F2.7050303@lefebvre.org><037501c80f3d$69120730$0c00a8c0@Artem> <471398BB.30405@lefebvre.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
William LeFebvre wrote: > Artem Kuchin wrote: >> CPU is more than just enough in my case. There will a a lot https >> sitting there but load, i am sure, will be low. > > If the load is low then you may not need very many processes. They belong to different sites ;) so they need to be run constantly and for security reasons each site has its own http. >> Swapping is simply unacceptable, so i am counting only real physical >> ram. > > Whether there is actual swapping going on or not, processes will still > [SNIP] >> >> However, noone mentioned anything about threads. DO they give any >> memory advantage on freebsd? > > Yes, threading within httpd should provide a big advantage. The top > [SNIP] Thank you very much for the answers. You were very helpful! -- Regards, Artem
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?03f601c80f51$da2032d0$0c00a8c0>