Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:18:41 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org>, Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r190943 - head/include Message-ID: <20090412021841.673a200b.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090411210702.ce5325b9.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <200904111657.n3BGvpsC092703@svn.freebsd.org> <20090411210702.ce5325b9.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:07:02 +0400 Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Log: > > GNU Pth has some fragile kludges that were broken by r189828. > > I've discussed this with the Pth maintainer and no clear solution > > has emerged on the ports side of things, so for now, hack around > > the issue in signal.h. > Can't we just put a patch in ports tree itself? What meant under 'no > clean solution emerged'? I can prepare a patch, if needed. I think so, too. I have a quick hack patch. ports/devel/pth/files/patch-pth_p.h.in - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- pth_p.h.in.orig 2006-06-09 02:54:03.000000000 +0900 +++ pth_p.h.in 2009-04-08 15:05:12.911807009 +0900 @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ #include <stdarg.h> #include <string.h> #include <setjmp.h> -#include <signal.h> +//#include <signal.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <errno.h> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090412021841.673a200b.nork>