Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:40:28 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interactive ports - the plague Message-ID: <47CC704C.1010106@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <20080303213454.53f29198@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <47CBC3C5.9050007@bsdforen.de> <20080303155354.2043d131@gumby.homeunix.com.> <47CC49B8.6080501@bsdforen.de> <20080303213454.53f29198@gumby.homeunix.com.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW wrote: > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:55:52 +0100 > Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> wrote: > >> RW wrote: >>> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100 >>> Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> wrote: >>> > >>>> I cannot find any policy on interactive ports in the Porters' >>>> Handbook. Maybe there aught to be one. >>> Setting BATCH is supposed to prevent genuinely interactive ports >>> from building (that's actually the original purpose of BATCH). >> But this will also keep the config screens away from me, which can be >> handled before all builds quite comfortably. > > Not if you do the config screens before setting BATCH. True, I suppose my make.conf will get a couple of new .if blocks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47CC704C.1010106>