Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 03:20:15 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205475] [NEW PORT] x11-themes/gtk-E17-theme: Dark GTK theme for Enlightenment Message-ID: <bug-205475-13-fDeK0AG0Ms@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205475-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205475-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205475 --- Comment #6 from matthew@reztek.cz --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #5) Since a new port has no maintainer until its committed, by definition there= is no maintainer to approve, exactly the same as an existing port without maintainer. I'm still waiting some logical explanation for the difference in handling, and that should include an explanation of why maintainer-approval exists but is not used in such a way to be useful filter criteria. This dead simple theme port sits for weeks. Is that because it doesn't show up in Maintainer Approved saved search that committers with a free moment might l= ook at first? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205475-13-fDeK0AG0Ms>