Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:34:38 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/ftpd ftpd.8 ftpd.c Message-ID: <20020809153438.B55921@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208091313140.4115-100000@scribble.fsn.hu>; from bra@fsn.hu on Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:25:05PM %2B0200 References: <200208081753.g78Hrq0X078614@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020809013552.B94821@espresso.q9media.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208091313140.4115-100000@scribble.fsn.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:25:05PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote: > > > Are these changes making it back to lukem to avoid lost functionality > > when we make the switch to lukemftpd? > I think before the switch could happen it is necessary to bring lukemftpd > at least for the same level of performance as the current ftpd. > Two examples: sendfile() support and resource usage. And I think they are > really important... As for me, I'd like to have the old ftpd and lukemftp coexisting for quite a time. It will be not the only case when similar functionality is provided by several stock programs differing in details. -- Yar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020809153438.B55921>