Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:08:03 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Henri DF <henri.dubois-ferriere@epfl.ch> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, Dan Pelleg <dpelleg+unison@cs.cmu.edu>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: unison-2.9.1 Message-ID: <20021004230803.GB35596@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210041908510.12001-100000@lcmpc4.epfl.ch> References: <20021004170623.GA4170@sunbay.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210041908510.12001-100000@lcmpc4.epfl.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:12:55PM +0200, Henri Dubois-Ferriere wrote: > All makes sense. My first impression on 2.9.20 was poor because of a=20 > (trivial) bug when i upgraded my linux machines to it, but i didn't=20 > realize you basically had only the choice between a beta and going back t= o=20 > a pre 2.9 release. >=20 > So I guess that there is not 'official' policy on putting out betas in=20 > ports ? Not an official one because there's no universally adhered-to notion of what 'beta' means to different software authors; it amounts to common sense on behalf of the maintainer. Kris --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9nh9TWry0BWjoQKURAhVQAKCtYWPjK4QHoLO6qGaaqAG9EOPSywCffJFm C2GGLn8lrshgm61i8NILNbI= =nibU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021004230803.GB35596>