Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:03:26 -0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Dias_Gon=E7alves?= <daniel@dgnetwork.com.br> To: Corey Smith <csmith@bonddesk.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load Balancing Outgoing, its possible ? Message-ID: <43624BCE.6010907@dgnetwork.com.br> In-Reply-To: <1130514267.81705.101.camel@localhost> References: <4361FE7E.50607@dgnetwork.com.br> <43624181.5010305@roamingsolutions.net> <1130514267.81705.101.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Corey Smith escreveu: >On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote: > > >>Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote: >> >> >> >>>It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some >>>software that I make this ? Zebra can help me? >>>This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the >>>user of NAT or IP valid ? >>>If it is possible, wanted to see examples with rules. >>> >>> >>> > >It would be much better to do per flow load balancing then per packet. >With per packet your TCP flows will arrive out of order which is a bad >situation since it will lead to a large number of retransmissions and >zero-window acknowledgments. > >The only tunable to help correct that is to allow selective >acknowledgments. > >You are going to get much higher utilization on your load balanced lines >by using per flow with multiple TCP connections. > >Anybody know how to implement per flow load balancing in FreeBSD? Are >multiple default routes supported? > >It would be beautiful if you could put multiple routes with the same >metric into the kernel and then the kernel would enable per flow load >balancing of the routes... > > It would be very good if could make this. >-Corey Smith > > > > Which the solution? -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Solutions daniel@dgnetwork.com.br (37) 99824809
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43624BCE.6010907>