Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 15:34:45 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r441852 - in head/net-im: . mastodon Message-ID: <20170528153445.GA51691@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <868tlhesdx.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> References: <201705271624.v4RGOkXd091073@repo.freebsd.org> <CAMHz58S99tZW36MMSz7XmTJXd8s5Hj%2BBBE2c7S2sfAu%2BapR_Cg@mail.gmail.com> <20170527211120.6ubqtabp7xtrbdqq@ivaldir.net> <868tlhesdx.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 09:28:58PM -0300, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > ... > There is certainly an instant messaging component to GNU Social, > Mastodon, and Twiiter, but one could make a case for Mastodon to be in > also be in net, or even www. I am OK to change it if we come to a > consensus or a majority opinion. Does anyone else have an opinion? There is a general rule (esp. when several categories seem to apply) to prefer most specific one. Right now there are ~2.5k ports in `www', ~1.5k in `net', and 200 in `net-im'. The latter looks 1) applicable enough, and 2) underpopulated compared to the other two. I'd say we go with it. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170528153445.GA51691>