Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 15:02:12 GMT From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/166730: Repocopy wine-geck Message-ID: <201204071502.q37F2CEx065707@ref10-i386.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201204071510.q37FA1j3016219@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 166730 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Repocopy wine-geck >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Apr 07 15:10:01 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Gerald Pfeifer >Release: >Organization: >Environment: >Description: The new wine-devel port, which relates to wine, needs a -devel version of wine-gecko as well, that is wine goes with wine-gecko and wine-devel goes with $NEWPORT I am just unsure, would that be wine-gecko-devel or wine-devel-gecko that needs to be repocopied from wine-gecko? (I have a new port from the maintainer of wine-gecko already, it just needs a decision on name and he repocopy.) >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201204071502.q37F2CEx065707>