Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:11:38 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        scottl@samsco.org
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, phk@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/amd Makefile.inc src/usr.sbin/amd/amd Makefile src/usr.sbin/amd/include config.h
Message-ID:  <20050806.191138.104336036.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <42F4F1D9.8050006@samsco.org>
References:  <200508061652.j76GqVWK010538@repoman.freebsd.org> <42F4F1D9.8050006@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <42F4F1D9.8050006@samsco.org>
            Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
: > phk         2005-08-06 16:52:30 UTC
: > 
: >   FreeBSD src repository
: > 
: >   Modified files:
: >     usr.sbin/amd         Makefile.inc 
: >     usr.sbin/amd/amd     Makefile 
: >     usr.sbin/amd/include config.h 
: >   Log:
: >   Respect the YES_HESIOD build variable
: >   
: >   Revision  Changes    Path
: >   1.12      +4 -0      src/usr.sbin/amd/Makefile.inc
: >   1.25      +5 -1      src/usr.sbin/amd/amd/Makefile
: >   1.31      +23 -0     src/usr.sbin/amd/include/config.h
: 
: It's silly to argue of the naming of variables, but yes adding
: new prefixes only seeds confusion.

Agreed.  I was going to write up a patch that will remove this
confusion and respect the current way of doing NO_FOO from a user's
perspective.  All I ask is that this not be MFC'd for a bit until we
know what direction to take.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050806.191138.104336036.imp>