Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:15:34 -0500
From:      Christopher Sean Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com>
To:        Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   File backed, rather than device backed, UFS filesystem Was - Re: Removable drives
Message-ID:  <1143645334.16112.26.camel@endaba.vindaloo.com>
In-Reply-To: <447j6d1i42.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <20060328232352.GA2765@dagobah.vindaloo.com> <447j6d1i42.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:43 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
[snip]

> Another option is to use the raw device.  For things like backups,
> this works well, because you can just direct the output of tar
> directly to the device.  Or pass it through compression and encryption
> filters on the way.
> 

I wonder if there is a way to do a file backed UFS filesystem with the
file on an MS-DOS partition. That may be a way to go.

-- chris




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1143645334.16112.26.camel>