Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:30:11 -0700
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bluestop.org>
Subject:   Re: Adding a new efi-update-loader script: need help understanding Makefile.inc1 for "make installworld"
Message-ID:  <ffdde530-b6e7-c455-2b60-9f490eac8cf3@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrcO2vgD=t76kmgZW0w9At41wg9iyJyEma1THTaH%2BkD1g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20190324090103.GO1923@kib.kiev.ua> <201903250926.x2P9QgYK078736@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <CANCZdfqpyf%2BPNMjQG2KQLY_a2a8_2Syu0_kTanc4ARmB97JTMg@mail.gmail.com> <2c1aef87-5408-7736-9039-7fc6a1214102@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfrcO2vgD=t76kmgZW0w9At41wg9iyJyEma1THTaH%2BkD1g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/25/19 12:27 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 12:34 PM John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/25/19 8:05 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> We started installing /boot/loader with install world in FreeBSD -3.x and
>>> it has affected the boot ability that whole time... in the early days of
>>> loader, the kernel loader handoff protocol was immature enough to need a
>>> matched kernel. But that period lasted only a few months...  loader has
>>> also been weird in other ways as well, since some embedded systems used
>> the
>>> one in its, while others needed an extra step. As UEFI support has
>> matured
>>> we're finding there are several issues around it as well where updating
>> the
>>> ESP needs to be tied to updating /boot for the system to work sometimes.
>> It
>>> has grown more complex over time, so we should separate. It's been a
>> little
>>> weird on all the non x86 platforms to different degrees, but now that our
>>> main platform is affected it's become clear we may need to change.
>>>
>>> But we need to do so carefully as this violates POLA in a huge way, as
>> well
>>> as needing doc changes in a bajillion places.
>>
>> I think we should treat files on the ESP the same way we treat other boot
>> blocks.  installworld should continue to install the latest version into
>> /boot (e.g. /boot/boot that holds UFS boot1 + boot2), but then some other
>> tool is used by the user to copy the updated loader.efi into the ESP.
>>
>> I think the main difference here is that traditionally other boot blocks
>> didn't change very often, so no one really needed to update it them
>> post-install.  loader.efi changes often enough we probably need to document
>> updating the ESP as an optional step in the upgrade process.  I think
>> having an automagical script will probably go sideways, but standardizing
>> where to mounting the ESP (or ESPs when doing RAID mirroring, etc.) means
>> we can provide a script with defaults (or instructions) that work with
>> the standardized approach.
>>
> 
> I think we need to have some automation in place. Something very specific
> and concrete. Otherwise we run the risk of updating the support files
> without updating loader.efi, possibly breaking boot if we wanted to add a
> new API to lua that the startup scripts call. Without an update of
> loader.efi, this generates an error.
> 
> I view /efi/boot/* as boot blocks, for these purposes, bit /efi/freebsd as
> fair game to update. So there is some nuance here we need to take into
> account and avoid absolutes about the BSP.

Hmm, I guess we considered it a bad idea to store all the support scripts
(not loader.conf, but all the 4th/lua) on the esp beside the loader?  That
would make the ESP bits be a self-contained, consistent snapshot.  loader.efi
could perhaps prefer to find those files on the partition it was loaded from
(you know that IIRC since when you are executed as an EFI app you get a
pointer to your Image and it has a backpointer to the device you came from
I thought) before looking for them on the root filesystem?  This would let
it still work when boot1.efi lives on the ESP instead, and also in the case
that you just copied loader.efi into the ESP without the support scripts.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ffdde530-b6e7-c455-2b60-9f490eac8cf3>