Date: 02 Dec 2002 11:11:53 -0800 From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Darren Pilgrim <dmp@pantherdragon.org>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is a port skeleton considered a derivative work under the GPL? Message-ID: <joadjo5j7q.djo@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <3DE9B0CC.8A368E61@mindspring.com> References: <3DE9A680.4000702@pantherdragon.org> <3DE9B0CC.8A368E61@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> writes: > You are basically asking the question "What makes A a derivative > work of B?". Basically, yes, but he's also asking, importantly, "how should I interpret the GPL's fuzzy and confusing derivative escape clauses?". The prior replay concerning risk avoidance works well here too, except when considering jurisdictions and locations of actions, remember the case of the Central American leader who is sitting in a US jail. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?joadjo5j7q.djo>