Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:09:28 -0200 From: Friedrich Locke <friedrich.locke@gmail.com> To: Aleksandr Miroslav <alexmiroslav@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?) Message-ID: <AANLkTi=f5Ffb-Tpz6D7O5S5pJQc43iw2S=_9OxLFFGqc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimzv6QV0cS=LmSO%2BS--1NwqhhRz9zwZd4H4bJ8c@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimzv6QV0cS=LmSO%2BS--1NwqhhRz9zwZd4H4bJ8c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Go for algr, i can't do wrong. On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav <alexmiroslav@gmail.com> wrote: > I have some boxes (about 40) that I was tasked with creating a > centralized logging infrastructure for. I see in ports that we have > several different versions of rsyslog, and syslog-ng. > > Is there any reason to use one or the other? Or should I just use the > syslog that come with the base OS? > > thanks, > Alex > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=f5Ffb-Tpz6D7O5S5pJQc43iw2S=_9OxLFFGqc>