Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:13:55 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS Message-ID: <44F491F3.8000200@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20060829075727.GD20989@catpipe.net> References: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> <44F3429F.6050204@FreeBSD.org> <44F344FA.1000408@elischer.org> <20060828195339.GF37035@funkthat.com> <44F362C0.6080309@elischer.org> <44F37063.6010302@elischer.org> <20060828182947.p8ylw4x48oko00kg@mail.bafirst.com> <20060829075727.GD20989@catpipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Phil Regnauld wrote: >eculp@bafirst.com (eculp) writes: > > >>I assume that you have seen the following: >> >>http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views >> >> > > That is definitely the right way to do it imho. > > unless as I said, I cannot run another nameserver on this box.. (there is already one running here) and even if I could I couldn't distiguish which sessions should get which views. > > >>I found it interesting although I haven't had time to give it a try >>especially since I'm thinking about leaving bind9 for djbdns and >>ldap2dns even though I've never been crazy about djbdns and family. >> >> > > djbdns is ok as long as you don't plan on using IPv6, EDNS0 or DNSSEC. > > Phil > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44F491F3.8000200>