Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:26:08 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD not stable enough for Xen? Message-ID: <gfjn7g$9f8$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <f1019d520811140300y58c26342vd946beef553f06f7@mail.gmail.com> References: <f1019d520811140300y58c26342vd946beef553f06f7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9A6E9FA21BAB316FA6BA24E4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Redd Vinylene wrote: > Hello hello. I want this hosting company to offer FreeBSD but they > claim it's not yet stable enough for their Xen setup. Is there > anything I can do to prove them wrong? No. Xen work is highly experimental even in -CURRENT. It *can* be used, and people have successfully booted FreeBSD under Xen but I don't think anyone is using it in production. If you're interested in FreeBSD-Xen, you can follow this mailing list: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen It's likely that Xen will be good enough to be used in FreeBSD 8. --------------enig9A6E9FA21BAB316FA6BA24E4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJHWBQldnAQVacBcgRAgErAJ9zUsYpCuHjTveENIT6TwMl+9fE7wCfeWGL 0EkMQ2eDS06CzOIa7xG1x+c= =fccy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9A6E9FA21BAB316FA6BA24E4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gfjn7g$9f8$1>