Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:45:43 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org, Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>, Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: category for VPN softwares? Message-ID: <20190402134543.mrx4z4lyq4omzmgn@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <CAP7rwcidQCWi96BmLUdDpXFB1xi8m-mh6ei1CmB4ULSDT6-EmQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20190402032434.i5tvmzjrti6bz44s@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190402044151.GG72200@home.opsec.eu> <20190402054219.pbibp2jxqhtwqkru@icepick.vmeta.jp> <954df870-50bb-c7c0-f559-94dd92fce3a6@freebsd.org> <CAD9iB3eRj_Sm=oxEFNkqrM-%2BQVXXNza-kLXAXTNmg%2BQLOvp=ng@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7rwcidQCWi96BmLUdDpXFB1xi8m-mh6ei1CmB4ULSDT6-EmQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ica23ty4kw6eso6o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 06:13:58AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:37 AM Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 10:58, Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > Am 02.04.19 um 07:42 schrieb Koichiro Iwao: > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 06:41:51AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > >> Create a real category vpn and move everything to it ? > > > > > > > > Sounds better! Gentoo has net-vpn category. Just FYI, Gentoo also h= ave > > > > net-dialup category. PPP/PPPoE/L2TP softwares are put under net-dia= lup > > > > but I feel that classification is too fine. At least creating vpn or > > > > net-vpn souds good. > > > > > > How about a new "real" category vpn > > > > > > I am not sure if it should be vpn or net-vpn. I feel net-vpn is > > more suitable. > > > > > > > and preserving the current categories > > > of the ports as their additional categories (assuming that they are i= n net > > > vs. security for a reason). > > > > > > > I like the idea. >=20 > Creating new categories is absolutely doable! However, we have a > pretty high bar for justifying it. There's no magic number, but our > (portmgr's) precedent is that the new category must, at the time of > creation, be as full as other categories like it. >=20 > The most important thing in the new category proposal is a > comprehensive list of ports that will be moved to it. Put that into a > review or a PR and we can move forward. Fair warning though, if it's > only about a dozen ports, it most likely will not be approved. >=20 > My approach here is that new categories should be virtual unless the > evidence for hard category is incontrovertible. And in any case, see our documentation: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#ports-q= a-new-category --=20 Mathieu Arnold --ica23ty4kw6eso6o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEOraXidLtEhBkQLpbOkUW81GDzkgFAlyjZ4ZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNB QjY5Nzg5RDJFRDEyMTA2NDQwQkE1QjNBNDUxNkYzNTE4M0NFNDgACgkQOkUW81GD zkiV8g//UE4cl0ZH/rKo5G11nMwxBEJc1eO0byARhCmt9iJdcnpng+Z4GaW5+lUP bnVvuhomUhSMpKniLPhR2H4hRNh/hCel9j0RsTCaMzF2EJ/wgbLfgyUtpHptyvDa M0XQ8FpRkhiq3nGpjzKorf5MlzWf5QAr2jGI5ZR0ssASB7Sq/BAkSvtHrCMazyUX PJTH8y/C/tPLAVolR5Fc/45fKG0xKDQaJMjS93unUA72VkqGn6h4SZ6OCWFyeHrA mrkz8H4MZpebu0NTqse1YagloNmXawTzjloAE/wXMjm3QlqwX2tC+y2ykAegw3oR YIq0XXymzW+ofk0CTeE+m5oWgLt2Ib+vyyhxpX8jwy4rduZem32dRQbQt+OGxXNl 45I5QZLLNj1AYec3/b0omCI1NGAUJwHPDX9u85llrl6KCAV+yygaHT7hbldddUaT 1lPqzhR+aQOUaNUpAHvxoWb1FzOvYSftK/4MZ7qPvOVV6KE/h6LamXMNziUyowLa x1PBGkLEDKcSGA3EEQP7LaTvqEYdkBSXL6tXxT66jQ2fAUYf3NC5eWbSbDzwZ6r3 1SBUaGQ0+EGyIr2KnwNn4CpGRnqYMR4HV5i2XrH41tka9ZyiEzT5Xb4FHKXZOVMT D8UONGMuEdelJURb2/7T67AN76tAWQdS714FJ96mwvTkDm1A90Q= =6Db1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ica23ty4kw6eso6o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190402134543.mrx4z4lyq4omzmgn>