Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:26:31 -0700 (PDT) From: SolarfluX <solarflux@ziplip.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Re: OpenSSL port Message-ID: <P2JLKVMAQB54AF5YPZVNSQNIWQVIIHAHX5CX4VMD@ziplip.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, please review my original email below, as it should have gone to you instead of to Dirk. The only reason I sent it to him is because he's listed in the Makefile for /usr/ports/security/openssl. Regards, -S > -----Original Message----- > From: Dirk Froemberg [mailto:dirk@FreeBSD.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002, 10:05 AM > To: SolarfluX <solarflux@ziplip.com> > Subject: Re: OpenSSL port > > Hi! > > I don't maintain the openssl port any longer. Sorry! > > cd /usr/ports/security/openssl && make -V MAINTAINER > ports@FreeBSD.org > > Regards Dirk > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:35:00AM -0700, SolarfluX wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to install OpenSSL 0.9.6b from ports to replace the base version > (0.9.6a) and it says: > > > > FORBIDDEN= "OpenSSL is already in the base system" > > > > Now, I know I could probably comment out the three lines and install it, but > I understand that it will just install the new version separately from the > base version, which is what I don't want. > > > > I'd think that the port should be 'smart' enough to ask the user if they > want to: > > > > (1) Upgrade the installed version or > > (2) Install the new version separately > > > > Please let me know your thoughts... > > > > -S > > > > P.S. One last last question, I see that OpenSSL 0.9.6c was released on Dec. > 21, 2001. When will that be incorporated? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?P2JLKVMAQB54AF5YPZVNSQNIWQVIIHAHX5CX4VMD>