Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:06:56 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: "barbara" <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [x11/nvidia-driver] conflicts with linux dri ports Message-ID: <81475023@h30.sp.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <KKVVQ5$55042A577C09ABEBE07BC00F05F0FD24@libero.it> (barbara's message of "Sun\, 7 Jun 2009 21\:34\:53 %2B0200") References: <KKVVQ5$55042A577C09ABEBE07BC00F05F0FD24@libero.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:34:53 +0200 barbara wrote: > > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and > > other linux dri ports to be in conflict. > > > > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace > > libGL.so with a link to nvidia library. Not good. Is it right to > > mark this port and other linux dri ports to be in conflict? > Why it's not good? > I'm not sure I've understood, but I think it's more or less the same with the native counterpart: if you install x11/nvidia-driver, libGL.so from graphics/libGL get replaced (actually renamed). Because if port B replaces a file from port A, then when port A is deinstalled, the file from the ports B is removed. WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81475023>