Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 02:26:30 +1100 From: james <death@southcom.com.au> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: 4.0 slower than 3.4? Message-ID: <4.2.2.20000109021927.00dba250@mail.southcom.com.au> In-Reply-To: <NDBBLKBFCKCJCKFEPIKJGEMDCEAA.entropy@kabsi.at> References: <ABD44D466F85D311A69900A0C900DB6BC5D5@staff.accessus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Sorry.. It seems i've stuffed up here. Somehow ipf was enabled. Doing "ipf -D" has sped things up. However, i am still seeing a 10-20% speed decrease from 3.4-STABLE. FTP transfers are still only on 5.8MB/s - not 7.7MB/s like they used to be. It's interesting though how i had no ipf rules whatsoever, yet it introduced so much latency, as Alexander has pointed out in another email. Why is ipf so slow? I was planning on switching from ipfw/natd to ipf/ipnat, but i don't think i want to now - considering it's so darn slow. Would it make a speed difference if i have ipf sitting there but disabled with "ipf -D"? Once again, sorry for buggering up. :( Cheers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20000109021927.00dba250>