Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:40:43 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, dinoex@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re[2]: openssh OR openssh-portable Message-ID: <20020701144043.GQ4764@madman.nectar.cc> In-Reply-To: <xzpsn33h5uk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <3D1AD7C4.9020909@cerint.pl> <xzp6604x5ue.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <41256714305.20020627163946@datafull.com> <xzpbs9wv172.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020701143038.GM4764@madman.nectar.cc> <xzpsn33h5uk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > > Of course, OpenSSH 3.4 is always available via the Ports Collection, > > and I would, in fact, recommend that users take advantage of it and > > turn on PrivilegeSeperation if at all possible. > > I wouldn't - the port needs quite a bit of work and is too much of a > moving target right now :( I'll have us agree by defining `if at all possible' to include a stable, working OpenSSH port :-) I'm sure Dirk is ready and willing to fix any problems that crop up. I think that the port currently provides the functionality needed by a large cross-section of users. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020701144043.GQ4764>