Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 11:10:03 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: ru@FreeBSD.org, Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/natd natd.c Message-ID: <20010708111002.G75626@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20010622172457.A31008@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 05:24:57PM %2B0300 References: <200106211028.f5LASfu90947@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010621152105.A53182@sunbay.com> <20010622101554.D86129@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010622172457.A31008@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 22 June 2001 at 17:24:57 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:15:54AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: >> On Thursday, 21 June 2001 at 15:21:05 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:28:41AM -0700, Josef Karthauser wrote: >>>> joe 2001/06/21 03:28:41 PDT >>>> >>>> Modified files: >>>> sbin/natd natd.c >>>> Log: >>>> When reporting that a packet can't be written back, usually because >>>> of a restrictive firewall rule, also report detail on the packet >>>> that caused the failure. >>>> >>>> MFC after: 3 days >>>> >>>> Revision Changes Path >>>> 1.34 +4 -3 src/sbin/natd/natd.c >>>> >>> Objection from the MAINTAINER. Please back out. >>> This functionality is already available with -v. >> >> It would be interesting to know why Joe didn't consult you first. > > Because the current implementation of MAINTAINER sucks? :-) No, the current implementation of MAINTAINER is completely up to the task. Greg > (/me still waits for approval for src/MAINTAINERS from -core.) I don't understand this statement. #We don't have any outstanding item from you. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010708111002.G75626>