Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:34:57 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, des@freebsd.org, Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r330387 - head/misc/compat8x Message-ID: <20131015223457.5388f001@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <525D8691.1050500@FreeBSD.org> References: <201310151139.r9FBdeLZ054477@svn.freebsd.org> <525D7FBB.3060108@FreeBSD.org> <525D84B6.6000306@FreeBSD.org> <525D8691.1050500@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:16:49 -0400 Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 2013-10-15 14:08:54 -0400, Renato Botelho wrote: >> On 15-10-2013 14:47, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> On 2013-10-15 07:39:40 -0400, Renato Botelho wrote: >>>> Author: garga Date: Tue Oct 15 11:39:39 2013 New Revision: >>>> 330387 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/330387 >>>> >>>> Log: - Update to 8.4.201310 - Remove liblwres.so.50 (not >>>> present on 8.4) - Remove libstdc++.so.6 to avoid conflict with >>>> compat9x [1] >>> >>> A binary built on 8.x requires both compat8x and compat9x now on >>> 10.x where libstdc++.so is not installed by default. Is it >>> intentional? >> >> It's better to require 2 compat ports to be installed than conflict >> both compat8x and compat9x, what would make it impossible to run a >> 8.x binary AND a 9.x binary on the same system. > > Okay. Then, this change deserves an entry in UPDATING, IMHO. Maybe add a runtime dependency on compat9x when ${OSVERSION} >= 1000054
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131015223457.5388f001>