Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:16:58 +0100
From:      dick hoogendijk <dick@nagual.st>
To:        freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: libvorvisfile.la vanished?
Message-ID:  <20030223091658.GA8781@nagual.st>
In-Reply-To: <200302231107.01488.will@unfoldings.net>
References:  <20030223085119.GA7748@nagual.st> <200302231107.01488.will@unfoldings.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Feb Willie Viljoen wrote:
> Try portupgrade -rR kdegames :)

I will..
Can it be _this_ simple?

This leads me to another question:
Is there a *right* syntax to use "portupgrade" for most cases?

I mean: portupgrade <package> is not enough most of the time (?)
Or do I have to use different options in all kind of different
situations? :-((

-- 
dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.7 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030223091658.GA8781>