Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:24:49 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_opie pam_opie.c Message-ID: <20020119142448.GA9803@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020119091012.32726F-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <20020119140308.GA9574@nagual.pp.ru> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020119091012.32726F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 09:14:20 -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > No one debates the technical points here. It seems, some people still tries to discuss them while the case is technically obvious. > They're asking you to get some > basic advanced review for modifications to the critical system > authentication code before you commit the changes. In many cases, the I agree. As I already write, I honestly search for MAINTAINER line and not found it. Then I remember that I try to report wrong pam_opie chaining problem to PAM people (without a solution since I don't know it those times) several times with no success and no discussion. Then I treat all of this like "go and fix by yourself, we are not interested in". -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020119142448.GA9803>