Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 16:01:59 +0100 (MET) From: j@uriah.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: lsys@np.ac.sg (SysAdmin - Ng Pheng Siong) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: Filesystem(?) preformance - 1.x and 2.0 Message-ID: <199501101501.QAA07760@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> In-Reply-To: <199501101330.FAA11941@freefall.cdrom.com> from "SysAdmin - Ng Pheng Siong" at Jan 10, 95 09:28:46 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As SysAdmin - Ng Pheng Siong wrote:
|
| Can someone running 1.x and 2.0 on almost similar h/w take a moment
| and try these, please?
My (and e.g. also Andreas Klemm's) opinion is just the opposite.
Especially the X server performance improved from 1.1.5 to 2.0. I've
run xbench against both systems, but the server even ``feels'' much
faster than the numbers are actually showing (though there's also a
performance gain).
| What about `time cat /etc/sendmail.cf', with identical files?
| == 2.0 == 0.71 real 0.02 user 0.36 sys
| == 1.x == 0.17 real 0.00 user 0.10 sys
Did you by incident run pccons on your 1.1.X system? Pccons has been
*way* simpler than either syscons or pcvt (though the latest pcvt is
again almost as fast as [at least NetBSD's -- they still have it]
pccons).
--
cheers, J"org work: --- no longer ---
private: joerg_wunsch@uriah.sax.de
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199501101501.QAA07760>