Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Nov 2016 07:59:36 +0800
From:      Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To:        "John W. Kitz" <John.Kitz@xs4all.nl>
Cc:        <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: How to change MAC address on RPI-B?
Message-ID:  <20161112075936.6cf98437@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <000f01d23c14$da3a6c00$8eaf4400$@Kitz@xs4all.nl>
References:  <005701d23a7d$71400630$53c01290$@Kitz@xs4all.nl> <20161110065105.77a19e3b@X220.alogt.com> <000c01d23b3a$c06e1ef0$414a5cd0$@Kitz@xs4all.nl> <20161111094930.46f55a60@X220.alogt.com> <000f01d23c14$da3a6c00$8eaf4400$@Kitz@xs4all.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi John,

On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:12:19 +0100
"John W. Kitz" <John.Kitz@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> JKi: The point I was trying to make is that locally administered MAC
> addresses serve a purpose in the recovery of hardware failures, e.g.
> in its basic form when one needs to replace a broken NIC thereby
> ending up with a system with a different MAC address, in those
> situations where the higher layer protocol (addressing or rather lack
> thereof, such as can be the case in SNA / VTAM installations) doesn't.
> 
> The other point, which you're not answering, is assuming that one
> would rely on the use of both lower and higher layer addressing in
> the recovery from hardware failures is there, in your experience, a
> noticeable gain in recovery time to be made by applying both
> techniques.

we have at the moment only the situation in which non-fault-tolerant
systems address our fault-tolerant system. Our emphasis is currently
only to detect a fault, switch MAC and IP address, report the fault and
let the outside world believe all is fine. We have then 1 to 4 days
time to fix the faulty system. Yes, I know, this is not a very common
situation. We use this only as users of the system have to have no IT
skills. They even wonder that there is some IT used in our system.

I can imagine where you come from. Your system is very, very different
from our system. Just have a look at our website. The words IT,
computer, fault-tolerant etc are not even used a single time.

Erich
> 
> Regards, Jk.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161112075936.6cf98437>