Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:05:47 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: Chris Marlatt <cmarlatt@rxsec.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USER/GROUP rules on the chopping Block [ Re: Panic on boot with April 16 src (lengthy info attached) ] Message-ID: <200706061705.48682.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <4666CA3E.8010501@rxsec.com> References: <20070417153357.GA1335@seekingfire.com> <200706061629.21923.max@love2party.net> <4666CA3E.8010501@rxsec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1904801.IuHvzGVNal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Chris Marlatt wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > > and again ... the thread ends here - zero feedback received :-( Does > > anyone care about user/group rules at all? If so - speak up now or > > I'll just disable them with the upcoming update!!! > > Unfortunately I can't claim to be seeing this symptom, but I do use > user/group rules on shell servers quite often. They're very useful for > controlling untrusted users in an environment like that. Hopefully it > can continue to be included. Doesn't matter if you see the symptom or not. You should also check how=20 the patch impacts on your workload and if it does at all. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1904801.IuHvzGVNal Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGZs1MXyyEoT62BG0RAnBYAJ9XnoyfUmaJJY4j8IuU+RQrIxHyWgCfd2et MVqk/R/gfW1iOvvFDXPeUZY= =2Qcj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1904801.IuHvzGVNal--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200706061705.48682.max>