Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 05:10:05 -0800 (PST) From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/48512: bogofilter 0.10.3.1 fails if started w/ 'bogofilter -l' Message-ID: <200302221310.h1MDA51u031113@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/48512; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Alex Vasylenko <lxv@send-pr.sink.omut.org> Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@web.de>, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/48512: bogofilter 0.10.3.1 fails if started w/ 'bogofilter -l' Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:05:40 +0100 After your patch, ./bogofilter -l tag -v would render the -v invisible because option processing aborts at the "tag". ./bogofilter -ltag however will look the same as ./bogofilter -l -t -a -g. and cause all cases of bogus aborts. The approach chosen upstream to split the option into -l without option and -L TAG (with mandatory option) avoids all these problems. I must therefore reject your patch. 0.10.3.2 or 0.11 is due soon and will include the fix. Please use a dummy -l argument until then, it can be empty, and it will only matter if you use custom log formats that include the %l specifier. -- Matthias Andree To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302221310.h1MDA51u031113>