Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Mar 2021 20:51:14 -0700
From:      Carl Johnson <carlj@peak.org>
To:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64?
Message-ID:  <86sg4gx7f1.fsf@bay.localnet>
In-Reply-To: <21BE83BC-0667-44F7-83E4-1664A2BC6017@icloud.com> (Andrew Mitchell via freebsd-arm's message of "Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:26:47 %2B0100")
References:  <21BE83BC-0667-44F7-83E4-1664A2BC6017@icloud.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Mitchell via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> writes:

> Hi everyone,
> I've seen that there are arm machines for FreeBSD other than
> Raspberry. I've been using it with 14.0-CURRENT, and my skills are too
> limited for patching it. So, I've decided to find a machine on which a
> RELEASE or STABLE version would work. To my knowledge, and after many
> tries, it seems that there are no FreeBSD working smoothly on RPI4 B.
> So, if you have any suggestions for a working FreeBSD on any machine, I'd be grateful.
> I won't discard 14.0 CURRENT, as I've done quite a few things which
> were much fun. It's just for getting other experiences.
>
> Please, tell me.
> Andy

I have 13.0-RC3 working well on a RPi 4B with 8GB RAM.  The only problem
I have is the efifb is working with very low resolution, and that would
unusable for my desktop use.  It current reports "VT(efifb): resolution
592x448" on a 1280x1024 monitor, but I haven't figured out a way to use
the full monitor resolution.  Raspbian does work properly, and my RPi 2B
running FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE also works properly with the same monitor,
but they don't use efifb.

-- 
Carl Johnson		carlj@peak.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sg4gx7f1.fsf>