Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:22:57 +0100 From: Doug Rabson <dfr@rabson.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, vova@fbsd.ru, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, attilio@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, amistry@am-productions.biz, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: VOP_ATTRIB ... and sysutils/fusefs-kmod Message-ID: <E233956F-11D5-4961-A71C-6F0F5F83257D@rabson.org> In-Reply-To: <200809081412.42281.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200808281530.m7SFU3h7013986@repoman.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0809020739390.1150@fledge.watson.org> <20080902.132447.652861696.imp@bsdimp.com> <200809081412.42281.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 Sep 2008, at 19:12, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 02 September 2008 03:24:47 pm M. Warner Losh wrote: >> In message: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0809020739390.1150@fledge.watson.org> >> >> Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> : 8-CURRENT kernels should reject old modules from loading unless >> : __FreeBSD_version hasn't been bumped. >> >> Sure would be nice if the error message were more helpful as to the >> cause. The current behavior is a bit, ummm, cryptic... > > Yes it is. I want to fix this but it requires overhauling some of > the basic > assumptions of the kernel module stuff and as such is tied up in my > desire to > really fix module versions (as per my mail to arch@ a while back). Which I forgot to reply to. For the record, I completely agree with your suggested change to module version semantics.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E233956F-11D5-4961-A71C-6F0F5F83257D>