Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 19:04:45 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jot(1) patch Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105101858240.1351-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200105092127.f49LR7b40095@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20010509210433.1BDA13E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Dima Dorfman writes: > : - use getopt > : - de-register > > You should de __P() as well. The changes add a prototype > > : -usage() > : +usage(void) > > which breaks K&R compatibility. So do one or the other. The one > thing worse than old K&R code in the tree is broken K&R code in the > tree. You should just not gratuitously break usage(). usage() is already declared to take a void in its forward declaration using __P(()), so using "void" in its definition just breaks K&R support. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0105101858240.1351-100000>