Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:53:50 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r179669 - head/sbin/rcorder Message-ID: <20080610145350.GA19374@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <86lk1du3au.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200806090907.m5997wwM043284@svn.freebsd.org> <86hcc2vjnv.fsf@ds4.des.no> <484E2E05.5080804@wubethiopia.com> <86lk1du3au.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:01:13AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Mike Makonnen <mtm@wubethiopia.com> writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > > How about s/REQUIRE/AFTER/, to mirror BEFORE? > > I would be in favor of that. Any objections? >=20 > (obviously, we'd have to keep REQUIRE for backward compat, and perhaps > emit a warning when we come across a script that uses it) I think we'd want to support REQUIRE quietly until 6.x and 7.x releases that support AFTER have been shipped for some time and a sweep of ports has been done. After that we could consider a warning in HEAD. That said, I'm not yet totally convinced (still thinking about it) given the level of churn involved. -- Brooks --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFITpV9XY6L6fI4GtQRAsSjAKCNV+6Hrr56K7C7ECrJq7eg7F0evgCgpURe xig665EZB+L+1QTx+w3oU20= =qm5S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080610145350.GA19374>