Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Apr 1996 17:15:42 -0400
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman), ilko@oclc.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Fix for missing _iso_ntoa?
Message-ID:  <9604302115.AA23479@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199604302027.NAA07719@phaeton.artisoft.com>
References:  <9604301824.AA22862@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199604302027.NAA07719@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 30 Apr 1996 13:27:35 -0700 (MST), Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> said:

> Garrett: what would it take to unify the address manipulation model
> to a set of common routines?

Someone more willing to waste their time than I am.

The IPX code takes the correct approach: just put it in a separate
library.  Programs which want to deal with address family X link
against X's library.  Problem solved.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... 
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance.
Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence.  We like people
MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish.  - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9604302115.AA23479>