Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:53:37 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: current@freebsd.org, erich@lodgenet.com Subject: Re: does HAVE_FPU really work? Message-ID: <199608220753.RAA20229@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>(ttyp1@jake)# pwd
>/usr/src/lib/msun
>(ttyp1@jake)# make
>cc -O -D_MULTI_LIBM -D_POSIX_MODE -D_IEEE_LIBM -c /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_acos.
>c -o e_acos.o
>shouldn't it be compiling /usr/src/lib/msun/i387/e_acos.S ???
Yes.
>Oh, well, make does a lot of stuff under the hood, so I proceeded to let
>it compile, but the resultant library libm.so.2.0, has exactly the
>same md5 as without HAVE_FPU defined --???
>then trying `make -ds e_acos.o', I get amongst other stuff:
>SuffFindDeps (e_acos.o)
> trying e_acos.s...not there
> trying e_acos.S...got it
> using existing source /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_acos.c
> applying .c -> .o to "e_acos.o"
>looks like it finds e_acos.S, but uses e_acos.c anyway.
didn't find
It shouldn't use e_acos.c, since e_acos.c isn't among the source
files if HAVE_FPU is defined (see the Makefile).
Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608220753.RAA20229>