Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:19:43 +0200
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts
Message-ID:  <20030606191942.GC1290@cicely12.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030606150443.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20030606.123654.96603092.imp@bsdimp.com> <XFMail.20030606150443.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:04:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> On 06-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <XFMail.20030606141331.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
> >             John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >  Also, we haven't
> > recorded our info in the underlying pci register.  Don't know if that
> > will matter for other OSes that are booted after we are.
> 
> Don't think it matters as far as reboots, but I do think that this
> code should write the updated intpin to the actual config register.

I have no clue what alphas would think about this when we use that
codepath some day.
In some cases the inline registers on alpha seem to be correct but have
different numbering than we use within FreeBSD.
I rather prefer not to change informations that SRM or PAL might use.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
ticso@bwct.de                                  info@bwct.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030606191942.GC1290>