Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 09:01:36 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local Message-ID: <19991112090136.A87828@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpyac4f3f4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@flood.ping.uio.no on Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 10:46:23AM %2B0100 References: <xzpyac4f3f4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 10:46:23AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > How would people feel about adding /usr/local/include and > /usr/local/lib to gcc's default header and library search paths, No. This is not PREFIX clean. > we already have /usr/local/lib in the default ldconfig_path, so why > not in the link-time search path as well? Because ldconfig_path is set in a config file (/etc/rc.conf). If the user makes PREFIX point elsewhere, they make a simple edit of rc.conf. Adding -IPREFIX/include to gcc burns this into the binary, and that is not easy for a sysadmin to change. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991112090136.A87828>