Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:02:44 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
To:        "Scott I. Remick" <scott@sremick.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401151600480.6457@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1lwz10b51pvyx$.iwa53nx2kix.dlg@40tude.net>
References:  <1lwz10b51pvyx$.iwa53nx2kix.dlg@40tude.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Scott I. Remick wrote:

> So I'm upgrading my 5.1R desktop to 5.2R. Used cvsup, followed the
> instructions in UPGRADING, did a custom kernel, etc etc. That part went
> fine, no probs.
>
> I noticed some of my daemons (from ports) seemed a bit annoyed though upon
> booting up 5.2. I tried using portupgrade -Rf on them individually, and
> then all was well. I decided then that it'd be best to do everything (-Raf)
> to play it safe. I've done this before.
>
> So it finally finished last night, but not really... about 132 ports were
> failed/skipped. My problem is figuring out the most efficient way to deal
> with it from here. LAST time I did a portupgrade -Raf I had a much smaller
> number failed/skipped, and what I did was work out the dependency tree for
> the remaining ones by hand using pkg_info -R and -r, figure out the order,
> and do a portupgrade -f on each in the proper order. This was to avoid
> rebuilding stuff already built on the first -Raf pass, and multiple times
> over (since I was taking care of each remaining one individually). Seems to
> me that if 50 of those 132 are X apps and I do a portupgrade -Rf on each,
> I'll be rebuilding XFree86 50 times. Hence the need to work out the install
> order by-hand based upon dependencies and only use -f. But I don't see that
> as practical this time around with so many left to do.
>
> So... my ultimate question is: how do you pros handle situations like this?
> Is there a trick I'm missing?

Do you know why the failure happened? The most frequent cause of this
when I've encountered the problem is that a distfile could not be
fetched. I tend to try to avoid that these days by prefetching the
distfiles prior to a build (ie, while I'm around to sort out problems
manually rather than overnight).

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
If it's broken really badly - don't fix it either.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.58.0401151600480.6457>