Date: 25 Feb 2002 00:24:35 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> Cc: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/procfs procfs.c Message-ID: <xzp1yfav4y4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <3C79736D.99BA7AB5@DougBarton.net> References: <200202182141.g1ILfBg02078@freefall.freebsd.org> <3C796D88.7581D74F@DougBarton.net> <20020224225056.GB6972@peitho.fxp.org> <3C79736D.99BA7AB5@DougBarton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> writes: > On another note, I realize that we're no longer mounting /proc by > default, so if I choose not to use that, I am guessing that I can > eliminate PROCFS from my kernel conf? And perhaps PSEUDOFS too? Sorry if > this is a silly question, but I'm still catching up with my mail. Yes. In either case, both are available as klds, so you can still mount /proc if you want to - but if you want procfs linked statically into your kernel, you need pseudofs there as well. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp1yfav4y4.fsf>