Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:34:51 +0000 From: Kamil Choudhury <Kamil.Choudhury@anserinae.net> To: Michael Fuckner <michael@fuckner.net>, Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: HPC and zfs. Message-ID: <3CEE2DA4348D944399A67E308B78D38A057C6E3E@janus.anserinae.net> In-Reply-To: <4F301979.6090302@fuckner.net> References: <4F2FF72B.6000509@pean.org> <20120206162206.GA541@icarus.home.lan> <CAOjFWZ44nP5MVPgvux=Y-x%2BT%2BBy-WWGVyuAegJYrv6mLmmaN-w@mail.gmail.com> <4F300CEA.5000901@fuckner.net> <413B1A6F-B076-4F50-90EA-7E17CF4B6E36@digsys.bg>, <4F301979.6090302@fuckner.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> zfs send to a second machine?=0A= =0A= Is there not likely to be a degradation in performance while doing the back= up? =0A= =0A= ...which ties into something that I think is missing from this thread: a st= atement of what this massive =0A= pool of storage is going to be used for. "HPC" is a pretty broad term, and = isn't quite a specification in =0A= my book. =0A= =0A= I have faith that the relevant BSD technologies can be cobbled together to = get OP to the performance=0A= level he needs, but -- and perhaps I have failed basic reading comprehensio= n here -- I don't think we =0A= have a clear enough picture of what that level actually /is/ to offer advic= e on what is almost certainly=0A= going to be a multi-million dollar installation! =0A= =0A= KC=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CEE2DA4348D944399A67E308B78D38A057C6E3E>