Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 18:45:39 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org Subject: Re: sync delay and consitency Message-ID: <20031126184539.6c995ffa.itetcu@apropo.ro> In-Reply-To: <444qwrkyck.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <20031125134915.2514dd57.itetcu@apropo.ro> <444qwrkyck.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26 Nov 2003 09:18:03 -0500 Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro> writes: > > > I have a machine that randomly crashes. I wonder if lowering > > > > Variable Default Description > > kern.filedelay 30 time to delay syncing files > > kern.dirdelay 29 time to delay syncing directories > > kern.metadelay 28 time to delay syncing metadata > > > > would help having a more up-to-date fs (using soft-updates). > > It might. This may depend on *why* it's crashing, so I'd try > attacking that problem first. Whish I knew. It's freezes (eg. no keyboard or mouse, replies to ping, but no new shh sesions, etc.) It is problaly something software, as I've changed almost everything on the hardware side. No drop to debugger, nothing in logs. (I suspect *something* in the interupt code, I'll try on 5.2when I'l have time). > > > Also is there a reason for the 30-29-28 (the 1 differece between) > > sequence ? > > I'd speculate that it's to keep the three cycles from synchronizing > with each other (which they would tend to do if they were repeating > with the same period). -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031126184539.6c995ffa.itetcu>